So I'm reading about biodiesel on WikiPedia and I come across this line:
Currently, biodiesel is more expensive to produce than petroleum diesel, which appears to be the primary factor keeping it from being in more widespread use.
I wonder what they mean by "more expensive."
It might be cheaper to extract oil from the ground than it is to process vegetable oil, but the writers of that article obviously haven't taken into account some of the auxiliary costs associated with petroleum.
For instance, it's currently costing the American Taxpayers two hundred billion dollars to wage a war in Iraq in order to ensure the cheap and non-interrupted flow of oil. I can't imagine any wars being waged over vegetable farms.
Then there's the trillions of dollars we're losing because our Government is focusing on Imperialistic endeavours instead of creating a sound and vibrant economy. How do you estimate the cost of someone's job?
Lastly, we need to ask ourselves what the true price of global warming and other environmental dangers is? Can you even put a dollar amount on those forces?
I'm not sure if BioDiesel is the best alternative to Petroleum, but I do think we need to frame the debate properly.



Recent Comments